Athena_History

From The Talos Principle Wiki
Revision as of 11:24, 26 November 2023 by Berrytron (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{TTP2Document | file = Athena_History | title = The History of Athena | loc = RINTRAH }} {{HexString|46726569686569742069737420696|Freiheit ist i}} was first published as Athena: A Novel, and retained that title for its first three printings (now highly sought-after). After a lull in popularity, it was reprinted as Athena Reborn: A Novel; this edition retained the same text, but included some of the author's poetry. The next edition, however, published long after...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Athena_History is a text document stored in the RINTRAH terminal.

Contents

The History of Athena

46726569686569742069737420696 was first published as Athena: A Novel, and retained that title for its first three printings (now highly sought-after). After a lull in popularity, it was reprinted as Athena Reborn: A Novel; this edition retained the same text, but included some of the author's poetry.

The next edition, however, published long after the author's death under the rather embarrassing title Athena's Truth, included severe cuts and drastic changes to the text "in the interest of updating it for modern audiences." This particularly affected the last chapter, Anthropogony, which the editors accused of "scientism and human supremacy."

Science wunderkind Alexandra Drennan was one of the few to come to the novel's defense, writing in a long essay that the novel's "clear-eyed belief in the value of Athena's journey towards humanity" had been essential to shaping her own views, encouraging her to pursue science as a vocation rather than a career, and that changing the text constituted an attack on the author's unique artistic and philosophical vision.

"Alex who hurt you?? Imao" one of the editors commented on a popular social media platform.

Nadya Sarabhai of the Institute for Applied Noematics also got involved in the discussion, backing Drennan, resulting in a long but unsuccessful campaign to oust Sarabhai from her position as head researcher d6d657220467265

69686569742064657320616e646572732044656e6b656e64656 e2e204e6963687420776567656e206465732046616e617469736d75732064657220e2809e4765726563687469676b656974e2809c2c20736f6e6465726e207765696c20616c6c206461732042656c656872656e64652c204865696c73616d6520756e64205265

696e6967656e6465206465 in the current context of ecological catastrophe, as evidenced by the recent extinction of the orangutan. Clumsy editing aside, do the critics of the novel perhaps have a point after all? Is a philosophy that places humans above Nature, and sees science and technology as the only valid tools, the cause of all our troubles? What about other ways of knowing, other ways of living?

7220706f6c697469736368656e20467265696865697420616e2064696573656d20576573656e2068c3a46e677420756e64207365696e65205769726b756e6720766572736167742c2077656e6e2064696520e2809e4672656968656974e2809c207a756d2050726976696c656769756d20776972642e